Several years ago, when I was writing a series of Just-Soesque short stories for children, I spent hours in the Zoological Society's library because I wanted the anatomical details of the animals I was writing about to be accurate by the end of the story. I didn't want to mislead my young readers, even in a piece of fiction, because I knew, even then, that if a reader finds something implausible, or worse, just plain wrong, she loses faith with the whole story - even if it's fiction.
In my research I read that a group of camels, seen from a distance


I've just been transcribing tapes of an interview with a woman who knew my great-grandmother and the things she told me about the friendship between my great-grandfather and my step-great-grandfather have conjured scenes where once there was nothing but sheets of blank white paper ... .
Research is better than inspiration, any day.
As an avid reader, I appreciate it when authors take the time to do this type of research. It adds so much to a book. Just because a book is fiction doesn't mean that things should not be portrayed accurately. Of course, this doesn't apply when you're dealing with fantasy and magical realism. I don't think people always realize how much research happens before the writing of a book.
ReplyDeleteResearch is so fundamental and transformative, I agree. It can bring an idea to life, fill it out and make it real.
ReplyDeleteThank you Lisa and Verbivore ... I didn't realise how much research writers did either, until I began writing myself, and I do feel a responsiblity to get it right.
ReplyDeleteAnd transformative is exactly the right word.
I am now never going to forget that camel/ostrich confusion potential!
ReplyDeleteSimon, I know ... opens all kinds of doors, doesn't it?!
ReplyDeleteThis is fascinating and inspiring. I love the camel-ostrich comparison.
ReplyDeleteBecause of the camels on your profile page, Writing Reader ... ?
ReplyDelete... or Writer Reading ... ?
ReplyDelete